Opened 14 years ago

Closed 14 years ago

#115 closed defect (fixed)

NDS Videoguard EMM process returns error

Reported by: andreground Owned by: Dingo35
Priority: major Component:
Severity: high Keywords: NDS EMM error
Cc: zichichi Sensitive: no

Description

Now the UA is sent/received and sent back correctly, but the videoguard_do_emm process still returns "error" on processing the EMM.

2009/11/29 20:00:42 7857 c04 received 76 bytes from client
2009/11/29 20:00:42 7857 c04 00 01 82 00 47 60 02 00 42 90 […]
2009/11/29 20:00:42 7857 c04 reader skyitalia has serial 0000AABBCCDD0000.
2009/11/29 20:00:42 7857 c04 emm UA:
2009/11/29 20:00:42 7857 c04 00 00 AA BB CC DD 00 00
2009/11/29 20:00:42 7821 r02 select: pipe is set
2009/11/29 20:00:42 7857 c04 send 15 bytes to client
2009/11/29 20:00:42 7857 c04 00 0D 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 82 10 00
2009/11/29 20:00:42 7821 r02 cccamuser type=00, len=71, idx=4, cnt=2: error (1 ms)

Change History (15)

comment:1 by landlord, 14 years ago

Keywords: NDS EMM error added
Summary: Process videoguard_do_emm returns error with SKY IT 0919NDS Videoguard EMM process returns error

I have got the same error with a Sky GER NDS SC:

2009/12/01 20:13:38  21391 r01 user01 type=00, len=45, idx=296, cnt=1: error (1 ms)

comment:2 by zichichi, 14 years ago

Cc: zichichi added

oscam not process emm for nds skyit. Emu used is mgcam:

5236 c01 received 37 bytes from client
2009/12/14 15:17:26 5236 c01 00 00 82 70 20 00 02 06 02 9B 0E 72 2D 52 16 90
2009/12/14 15:17:26 14 40 02 BE F6 5A 18 AF B5 82 29 1C D5 A9 53 36
2009/12/14 15:17:26 14 2E 12 C9 B9
2009/12/14 15:17:26 5236 c01 reader skyitalia has serial 00000XXXXXXX0000.
2009/12/14 15:17:26 5236 c01 emm UA:
2009/12/14 15:17:26 5236 c01 00 00 01 4D B3 6E 00 00
2009/12/14 15:17:26 5236 c01 send 15 bytes to client
2009/12/14 15:17:26 5236 c01 00 0D 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 82 10 00
2009/12/14 15:17:26 5230 r02 select: pipe is set
2009/12/14 15:17:26 5230 r02 chris type=00, len=32, idx=0, cnt=1: error (0 ms)

comment:3 by papampi, 14 years ago

I have the same problem !!!

2009/12/17 12:59:41 2257 r02 user1 type=00, len=39, idx=0, cnt=1: error (1 ms)
2009/12/17 12:59:41 2257 r02 user2 type=00, len=39, idx=0, cnt=2: error (1 ms)
2009/12/17 13:20:29 2257 r02 user1 type=00, len=39, idx=0, cnt=3: error (0 ms)

any news on emm AU for nds3 ???

comment:4 by tanica76, 14 years ago

Same problem with cccam as client and oscam as server, protocol newcamd.
Ubuntu 8.04 i686 and pcsc.
AU is very important.

comment:5 by papampi, 14 years ago


tested with Mgcamd and use A {01} in mg_cfg

still the same :


USER1=mgcamd 1.31

User= CCcam 2.1.3

[[BR]]
2009/12/18  1:56:58   2257 r02 USER1 type=00, len=33, idx=52, cnt=1: error (0 ms)
[[BR]]
2009/12/18  1:56:59   2641 c01 USER1 (093B&000000/24E6/82:9D98): found (122 ms) by skyitaly
[[BR]]
2009/12/18  1:56:59   2257 r02 USER1 type=00, len=110, idx=53, cnt=1: error (0 ms)
[[BR]]
2009/12/18  1:57:00   2257 r02 USER1 type=00, len=161, idx=54, cnt=1: error (1 ms)
[[BR]]
2009/12/18  1:57:00   2257 r02 USER1 type=00, len=32, idx=55, cnt=1: error (1 ms)
[[BR]]
2009/12/18  1:57:02   2260 c02 USER (093B&000000/2AA8/82:6F55): found (122 ms) by skyitaly
[[BR]]
2009/12/18  1:57:02   2260 c02 USER (093B&000000/05B9/82:31C0): found (122 ms) by skyitaly
[[BR]]
2009/12/18  1:57:03   2257 r02 USER1 type=00, len=32, idx=56, cnt=1: error (0 ms)
[[BR]]
2009/12/18  1:57:05   2257 r02 USER1 type=00, len=32, idx=57, cnt=1: error (0 ms)
[[BR]]
2009/12/18  1:57:06   2257 r02 USER1 type=00, len=32, idx=58, cnt=1: error (0 ms)
[[BR]]
2009/12/18  1:57:08   2257 r02 USER1 type=00, len=32, idx=59, cnt=1: error (0 ms)
[[BR]]
2009/12/18  1:57:09   2641 c01 USER1 (093B&000000/24E6/82:F75F): found (121 ms) by skyitaly
[[BR]]
2009/12/18  1:57:10   2257 r02 USER1 type=00, len=163, idx=60, cnt=1: error (0 ms)

#

comment:6 by andreground, 14 years ago

This is a SERIOUS issue! :(

comment:7 by papampi, 14 years ago

Yes !!!
This is so serious and it seems no one bother to fix it !!!!!

comment:8 by rorothetroll, 14 years ago

people ... I would remind you that we all do this for free ... on our free time ... so keep complaining like that .. and we will just stop al development.. we owe you nothing .. we do it because we like doing this kind of stuffs. So if you don't like our way of doing development .. go somewhere else..
Because as far as I know we didn't sign any contract or anything saying we have to obey all of your demand and that we will fix everything overnight..

comment:9 by papampi, 14 years ago

Thanks for your concern and sorry for the tone!
I am not complaining its just we are desperate and need to know you guys know the problems !
I know u dont get any thing by doing this and that you do this as a hobby and free and of course in open source there is no written contract but there is a mutual contract the first time u wrote a great program like this between u ( programers) and us (users)! so that u should support yr work !
dont be angry with us ! its just we need to know that u know there is a problem !
thanks again for your great job here !!!
keep up the good work !

comment:10 by rorothetroll, 14 years ago

Owner: set to Dingo35

let me correct you : there is no mutual contract ... I do what I can to improve it and yes we read the tickets everyday ... but that's it. I owe you nothing and if I don't fell like replying to a ticket .. I don't ... if no one replies in the team that's our right (specially during holiday periods... we have a life and families...).
So I would suggest you tune down the whining and learn to be patient. We don't break things on purpose. It's because of attitude like this that the newcs team stopped... you might want to make sure we don't do the same... if you aren't part of the solution you are part of the problem...

comment:11 by papampi, 14 years ago

I should say u are absolutely right and we were nagging and you guys are doin all u can do !
but its just we are desperate !
and we only have u guys to ask for help from !
so thanks for the great job on this project ! and we are lookin for more improvements !!!!
thanks and sorry again !

comment:12 by papampi, 14 years ago

so any news on EMM on NDS3 videoguard ?

comment:13 by papampi, 14 years ago

so thank you team oscam it seems there is a new patch 1377 which said that corrected the emm
although I still get this message :
2010/01/25 19:42:59 2579 s client(1) connect from 192.168.1.15 (pid=2588, pipfd=12)
2010/01/25 19:42:59 2588 c01 encrypted newcamd:34000-client 192.168.1.15 granted (papampi1, au=skyitaly)
2010/01/25 19:42:59 2588 c01 user papampi1 authenticated successfully (using client 4343)
2010/01/25 19:42:59 2588 c01 AU flag 0 for user papampi1

any idea ?

comment:14 by papampi, 14 years ago

still the same !!!! client mgcamd !!!!

2010/01/25 19:42:06 2578 s version=0.99.4svn, build #1376, system=i686-pc-linux, nice=-19 . . . . . . 2010/01/25 20:24:55 2579 s client(1) connect from 192.168.1.15 (pid=2607, pipfd=12) 2010/01/25 20:24:55 2607 c01 encrypted newcamd:34000-client 192.168.1.15 granted (papampi1, au=skyitaly) 2010/01/25 20:24:55 2607 c01 user papampi1 authenticated successfully (using client 6D67) 2010/01/25 20:24:55 2607 c01 AU flag 0 for user papampi1 2010/01/25 20:24:55 2591 c03 papampi (093B&000000/0E33/82:B795): found (123 ms) by skyitaly 2010/01/25 20:24:57 2607 c01 papampi1 (093B&000000/24E6/82:3D19): found (123 ms) by skyitaly 2010/01/25 20:24:57 2583 r02 papampi1 type=00, len=145, idx=0, cnt=1: error (0 ms) 2010/01/25 20:24:58 2583 r02 papampi1 type=00, len=32, idx=1, cnt=1: error (1 ms) 2010/01/25 20:24:59 2583 r02 papampi1 type=00, len=145, idx=2, cnt=1: error (0 ms) 2010/01/25 20:24:59 2583 r02 papampi1 type=00, len=32, idx=3, cnt=1: error (0 ms) 2010/01/25 20:25:01 2583 r02 papampi1 type=00, len=135, idx=4, cnt=1: error (0 ms)

comment:15 by papampi, 14 years ago

Resolution: fixed
Status: newclosed

thank you oscam team !!!
its done !!!!
Tier: 000b, expiry date: 2010/03/18-00:00:00
Tier: 0226, expiry date: 2010/03/18-00:00:00
Tier: 0228, expiry date: 2010/03/18-00:00:00
Tier: 022e, expiry date: 2010/03/18-00:00:00
Tier: 0295, expiry date: 2010/03/18-00:00:00

last I checked it was : 2010/02/18

Note: See TracTickets for help on using tickets.