#1786 closed defect (invalid)
oscam 4992 don't start with ipbox (ppc)
Reported by: | dlfuma | Owned by: | Admin |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | blocker | Component: | General |
Severity: | high | Keywords: | |
Cc: | Sensitive: | yes |
Description
4992
Issue Description
oscam don't start
When the issue occurs
always
How the issue is reproducable
always
<Don't forget to ATTACH (not post here) a log file of oscam in debug mode (start oscam with -d255)!>
Attachments (1)
Change History (14)
by , 13 years ago
comment:1 by , 13 years ago
i reconfirm this,
since 4982 oscam stapi crash after few secs ( i also check this with rev 5001 , same happened)
last version which work with ipbox for me was 4981
comment:2 by , 13 years ago
Component: | Please fill in → General |
---|---|
Owner: | set to |
Priority: | critical → blocker |
Sensitive: | set |
comment:4 by , 13 years ago
Owner: | changed from | to
---|
it is no longer possible to use dvbapi without a user defined in dvbapi section in oscam.conf after r4982, this is not a dvbapi issue.
comment:5 by , 13 years ago
thanks _network for info
@admin
would u mind please to tell us why do u make this change? what is the advantages? ...
what was wrong in past that everything works ok and now we have to respond thousands unaware person since 4982 u have to set a user in your dvbapi nevertheless u have crash !!
also in past config was much easy without any oscam.user oscam.service ,... oscam works very fast and stable , if that was for security issue , u could define new parameter (ie user_for_dvbapi_required = 1 then user have to be defined in dvbapi if not , it works as past
Thanks and wait for your respond,
comment:6 by , 13 years ago
Admin = guilty -> kill him
damn, pooyair, this is a sideeffect! Don't think that Admin has done it to let thousends of boxes of thousends of unaware users (which indead update each day to latest trunk) crash. Just for fun!
Thanks and wait for your respond,
if not?
comment:7 by , 13 years ago
Resolution: | → invalid |
---|---|
Status: | new → closed |
Nothing to say,
i didn't say he intend that,
but many guys use oscam that never come to streamboard they only use latest rev which are published in all over the web , and they do not change their config ( those are thousands guy that u never could understand cause u never see them !!!)
bye
comment:8 by , 13 years ago
use tagged version if you have no clue - use trunk and live with unstability and bugs (as the selvespeeking binary name says) You expect perfect stability from nightly builds of a software? Oscam trunk is nothing else then nightly builds
comment:9 by , 13 years ago
there is some misunderstanding for u,
i never expect that this trunk would be perfect stable , but i just think not bad that on message comment there was some clear description and even if not , the doc or wiki be updated , if not , one who make some architect change in oscam , reply to problem which spend at least 2 hours with headache for me
comment:10 by , 13 years ago
IT WAS A COLATERAL DAMAGE = SIDE EFFECT = MISTAKE = BUG. Do you expect that Admin know this and write it in the committext????
comment:11 by , 13 years ago
dear alno
no , surely he didn't know it and every commit (effort) even if not works (even if regression) is appreciative
but i have expect he respond to me , i spend even yesterday rev one by one which one cause this problem , but even he didn't tell me his idea since morning in forum (where u and me said we should wait for admin's respond (and still he doesn't... this make me sad), at last, _network who is another person who could understand the code same as admin, aware all of us
think some misunderstanding for me and u, and let's pass and forget it,
i really apologize from u , and admin if i got heat...
I have fully respect to all of u nice guys,
comment:12 by , 13 years ago
(and still he doesn't... this make me sad
think he has beside of oscam a payed job too and cannot respond 24/7
log -d255